New Delhi [India], December 10 (ANI): Congress MP Manish Tewari raised concerns in the Lok Sabha over the growing trend of cash transfer schemes being used ahead of elections and demanded a constitutional amendment to restrict such practices for governments with high debt burdens.
Speaking in the lower house on Tuesday, Tewari said that if the debt-to-GDP ratio of any state or the central government crosses 20 per cent, they should not be allowed to carry out cash transfers, stating that such practices put an unsustainable burden on the national exchequer and risk pushing the country into a financial crisis.
“This growing trend of distributing money, that as elections approach the government starts transferring cash directly into people’s accounts, what kind of democracy is this?” he said.
“Is this what democracy has become, that 15 days before elections, 20 days before, a month, or even two months earlier, you start depositing money into people’s accounts? And this is why I am concerned, there is a serious misuse of democracy, and a major manipulation of India’s revenues,” he added.
The Congress MP stated that he had earlier raised inquiries in Parliament regarding the scale of borrowings by governments.
“As of 24 March 2025, the combined liability of the central and state governments–their total debt–is Rs 2.67 lakh crore,” he said.
Highlighting the rising debt levels among states, Tewari said that in the financial year 2023-24, 18 out of 28 states have a debt-to-GDP ratio of more than 30 per cent.
Tewari noted that under Articles 292 and 293 of the Constitution, the Parliament has the authority to fix borrowing limits for the central and state governments. Article 292 deals with borrowing by the Government of India, while Article 293 governs borrowing powers of state governments.
He suggested that the Constitution requires one more provision. “There is a need to add one more Article — Article 293A — and it should specifically state that if the debt-to-GDP ratio of the central government or any state government is more than 20 per cent, ideally it should be 10 per cent–then that state government or the central government should not be allowed to make any cash transfers. You cannot win elections at the cost of the national exchequer or the state exchequer,” Tewari said.
He warned that allowing cash transfers by heavily indebted governments will “absolutely bankrupt our democracy and bankrupt our country.”
Calling it a “very important proposal,” he cautioned that if this proposal is not implemented, “No state government will ever change. Elections come, and someone transfers Rs 20,000, someone Rs 15,000, someone Rs 35,000 into people’s accounts, and they get elected again. Meanwhile, the debt of your state keeps rising, and there are several states in this country that take additional loans just to pay the interest on their existing debt,” he cautioned.
According to a report by Emkay Research, “The last 20 years have seen states’ spending usually picking up post-elections…. Almost each of these states introduced new freebie schemes (especially for women), regardless of party lines, as such schemes have proven to be an election-winning strategy.”
The report observed that expenditure on welfare schemes and freebies tends to be “sticky,” making it difficult to reduce once introduced, while new programs further increase the burden.
Looking at the most recent cycle, the report pointed out that 10 major states went to polls in the last two years–five in FY24 and five in FY25. On average, these states saw the fiscal deficit-to-GDP rise by 1 percentage point in the election year compared to the previous year, and then remain flat in the following year. (ANI)
Disclaimer: This story is auto-generated from a syndicated feed of ANI; only the image & headline may have been reworked by News Services Division of World News Network Inc Ltd and Palghar News and Pune News and World News
HINDI, MARATHI, GUJARATI, TAMIL, TELUGU, BENGALI, KANNADA, ORIYA, PUNJABI, URDU, MALAYALAM
For more details and packages
